Stockpack packaging product range photograph showing bottles, pouches, caps, labels and shrink film
Expanded product range

Bottles, pouches, caps, labels and film in one place.

Browse individual bottle, pouch, cap, label and shrink-film options, then send a quick enquiry so we can confirm current availability, lead time and suitability.

  • Every item is quoted individually as contact for price.
  • Each product includes a quote form for specification, quantity and lead-time checks.
  • Clear product photographs help you compare shapes, sizes, formats and finishes before requesting a quote.
Featured products

Start with a product image, then request a quote.

Send quantities, specifications and compatibility requirements to Stockpack for a tailored quote.

Evidence-led packaging selection

Environmental packaging decisions that can be specified and tested.

Choosing environmentally positioned packaging is not a matter of selecting the product with the strongest label. The useful comparison is the complete pack: the exact material and construction, the amount of material used, the product protection required, the filling and sealing process, transport performance, and the realistic end-of-life route in the market where the pack will be sold. Lancing uses this evidence-first approach when discussing bottles, pouches, closures, labels and shrink film.

Evidence before environmental wording

Ask for a current supplier declaration that identifies the material, any layers or components, the basis of a recycled-content figure, the product or batch covered, the issue date and any limitations. A certificate, test report or declaration should be read for scope: it may apply to one resin, colour, size or production site rather than every related product.

Terms such as recyclable, recycled, compostable, biodegradable and low carbon describe different things. They should not be used interchangeably, and none proves that a pack is suitable for a particular product or collection system.

Compatibility before conversion

A lighter or simpler pack is useful only when it still protects the contents and runs reliably. Product chemistry, oxygen or moisture sensitivity, fill temperature, neck and closure geometry, sealant layer, label adhesive, print method, transport loads and the intended shelf life can all affect the correct specification.

For a production-line project, Lancing also checks how the pack presents to conveyors, filling heads, capping equipment, labellers, sealers and inspection devices. Samples and a representative product trial are the safest basis for final confirmation.

Buyer questionUseful evidence or inputWhy it matters
What is the pack made from?Material declaration, layer structure, component weights and colourFormat names alone do not show whether a pack is mono-material or a multi-material structure.
Does it contain recycled material?Percentage, calculation basis, source, scope and dateA percentage can refer to the whole pack, one component, or only part of a component.
Is it collected and sorted?Intended UK market, format, dimensions, colour and current collection guidanceTechnical recyclability is not the same as access to collection, sorting and reprocessing.
Will it protect the product?Product data, barrier need, fill conditions, shelf-life target and transport routeProduct loss or damage can outweigh a reduction in packaging material.
Will it run on the line?Physical samples, drawings, tolerances, closure details and planned outputSmall dimensional or surface differences can affect handling, sealing, capping and labelling.

A distinct role for this site

Environmental Packaging is the evidence and compatibility layer for Lancing packaging enquiries. It helps buyers identify what must be proven before an environmental claim is used and what must be tested before a material or format is approved. It does not assume that every item in the wider product catalogue has an environmental advantage. Product pages retain their exact known specifications, while the guides explain how to compare those specifications responsibly.

Packaging decision workflow

Move from a sustainability objective to an approved production pack.

Searches for sustainable packaging UK, environmentally friendly packaging and recyclable packaging materials often begin with a broad objective. A purchasing decision needs a narrower route: define the required pack function, identify the exact components, collect evidence for the proposed wording, and prove that the candidate can be filled, closed, labelled, stored and transported without unacceptable loss or rework.

Separate the objective from the claim

An objective might be to reduce virgin material, lower pack weight, simplify the material structure, improve collection compatibility or establish a reuse system. None of those objectives should be converted into a customer-facing statement until the scope, comparison basis and supporting documents are agreed.

This distinction allows procurement teams to explore alternatives without describing every candidate as environmentally preferable before the evidence is complete.

Lock the functional baseline first

Record the accepted product protection, shelf life, seal or closure performance, line output, reject level, storage conditions and distribution route. A candidate can then be compared against the same functional requirements rather than against appearance or material name alone.

Where the current pack has known failures, record them separately so that an alternative is not approved merely because it is different.

Decision stageEvidence or trial inputApproval output
DefineProduct, pack function, target market, annual volume and environmental objectiveWritten brief with measurable functional and evidence requirements
ShortlistMaterial and component declarations, drawings, samples and known limitationsCandidate packs that can be compared on the same basis
TestActual product or agreed equivalent, production equipment and acceptance criteriaRecorded fill, seal, cap, label, handling and distribution result
SubstantiateDated supplier evidence, calculation basis and UK end-of-life contextApproved wording that is no broader than the evidence
ReleaseFinal artwork, specification, approved sample and change-control ownerControlled pack specification for purchasing and production

Use precise routes for different packaging questions

Recycled plastic packaging requires a component-level percentage and basis, while a mono-material pouch requires confirmation of every functional layer, zipper, valve, coating and print system within the stated scope. A lightweight bottle needs top-load, capping, handling and transport checks. A label change may improve or reduce complete-pack recycling compatibility depending on face stock, adhesive, coverage and separation behaviour. These are related decisions, but they are not interchangeable.

The recycled-content packaging guide explains how to define PCR and rPET evidence without assuming that a product name proves the percentage. The existing environmental claims guide covers wider substantiation, and the compatibility testing guide sets out a controlled trial route.

Questions buyers commonly ask

Does a recyclable material automatically make the complete pack recyclable?

No. The body, closure, liner, label, adhesive, colour, size and product residue can all affect collection, sorting and reprocessing. The assessment must cover the exact complete pack and intended market.

How should recycled content be compared between packaging options?

Use a dated supplier declaration that states the percentage, calculation basis, component scope, material source and product reference. A percentage for one component should not be presented as the percentage for the whole pack.

Can packaging be approved from a data sheet without a production trial?

A data sheet can support a shortlist, but it does not prove performance with the actual product, line settings, closure, label, storage and distribution route. Representative samples and agreed acceptance criteria are needed for final approval.

What information produces the most useful Lancing quotation?

Send the current pack or samples, product and fill conditions, drawings or key dimensions, closure and label details, annual quantities, delivery pattern, line output and the exact environmental evidence or claim that needs to be confirmed.

Environmental packaging resources

Research the material, evidence, line and quotation as one decision.

The final resource cluster gives procurement, sustainability, quality and production teams a shared route from an initial search to an approved pack. Use the hub to choose the relevant guide, then return to the catalogue with a clearer material, component and evidence brief.

Start with the complete buyer route

The sustainable packaging buyer’s guide turns objectives such as recycled content, recyclability, lightweighting and reuse into measurable requirements.

Use the correct UK evidence

The recyclability assessment guide and EPR data guide connect the pack specification to current official methods and reporting records.

Compare complete formats

Use the dedicated bottle and pouch guides, then review closures and labels as part of the same system.

Prepare for approval and price

The trial guide and quotation guide show what samples, criteria and commercial inputs are needed.

Buyer questions

Questions manufacturers ask before choosing packaging

These questions connect a broad environmental objective to the product, pack, production line and evidence that must actually be approved.

Where should a packaging review start: material, pack format or environmental claim?

Start with the product and the job the complete pack must perform. Define containment, protection, dispensing, production, distribution and customer-use requirements before comparing a material or claim. This prevents a promising environmental feature from being selected before the pack function is understood.

The material comparison questions provide a consistent decision frame.

Can one packaging option be “most sustainable” for every product?

No. A packaging option can only be compared within a defined application and boundary. Product loss, pack weight, recycled input, production rejects, transport, reuse where real, and end-of-life route can change the result. Broad claims should be narrowed to the evidence actually available.

Review the environmental term questions before approving wording.

What should be included in an initial packaging brief?

Include the product, pack size, current container and closure, material preference if any, target quantity, fill or packing process, storage and distribution conditions, artwork needs and the objective of the change. Add samples, drawings and supplier evidence where available.

Use the packaging question library to identify the remaining information.

Technical buyer decisions

Prove protection, supply and identification before changing a pack.

A packaging change should be approved as a complete commercial and production system. The next-stage guides below cover questions that sit between initial material selection and a repeatable, defensible purchase.

Will the pack protect the product for the required shelf life?

Use product risks, actual fill conditions, seals and closures to define the barrier trial rather than selecting from a material name alone.

Plan shelf-life and barrier testing

Will it survive the real distribution route?

Assess the filled pack, case and pallet against stacking, impact, vibration, temperature and parcel or pallet handling.

Plan distribution testing

Can the supplier evidence be approved?

Match every claim, declaration and certificate to the exact product reference, scope, date and proposed use.

Use the supplier due-diligence guide

How will opening and identification be controlled?

Confirm tamper evidence, label adhesion, coding, inspection and recycling interaction on the intended line.

Compare tamper-evident options and review print and coding compatibility.

Packaging evidence beyond the material name

Close the gaps between a packaging claim and an approved pack.

Buyers increasingly need the packaging specification to support tax, UK reporting, EU export, carbon comparison, artwork and production-quality decisions at the same time. These are related records, but none should be inferred from a broad “sustainable packaging” description.

Tax and recycled-content records

Use component-specific percentages, mass, quantities and supplier evidence for the UK Plastic Packaging Tax review.

Review Plastic Packaging Tax inputs

EU export packaging

Map PPWR roles, packaging levels, material details, labelling and phased requirements before supplying the EU market.

Prepare an EU PPWR packaging file

Carbon and life-cycle comparisons

Compare the same protected-product function, system boundary and data quality rather than one empty-pack attribute.

Use the packaging LCA guide

Seal, closure and artwork control

Connect leak tests, torque trials and recycling instructions to the exact pack and production route.

Plan pack-integrity testing

How do you assess a change to recyclable packaging material?

Treat a material change as a pack-and-process trial. Confirm the proposed material structure, intended use and recycling claim with the packaging supplier, then check how it runs, seals and protects the product. Existing machine settings may need review, and recyclability wording should match the actual complete pack.

Related guidance: review print and coding compatibility · environmental term questions